Last update: July 1, 2015

Inspection is the act of examining the physical condition of a piece of equipment in order to determine if and for how long it will operate as intended. Inspection plays a vital role in any asset integrity management program. There are several different inspection techniques, some that use advanced instrumentation, others that do not.

Some examples of inspection techniques are:

Visual Inspection

Visual Inspection is the oldest and most basic method of inspection. It is the process of looking over a piece of equipment using the naked eye to look for flaws. It requires no equipment except the naked eye of a trained inspector. Although, equipment can be used to improve the range or accuracy of visual inspection, including things like remote visual inspection techniques and unmanned aerial systems.

Ultrasonic Testing

Ultrasonic testing actually refers to group of related nondestructive examination (NDE) techniques that all use short, high-frequency ultrasonic waves. They generally work by emitting waves into a material and measuring these waves in order to identify the properties of the material and any internal flaws. Some specific ultrasonic inspection techniques include long range ultrasonic testing, phased array ultrasonic testing, and time of flight diffraction.

Hydrostatic Testing

Hydrostatic testing is process where components, such as piping or pressure vessels, are tested for strength and leaks by being filled with pressurized liquid. This is done until until a specific pressure is reached. The pressure is then held for a specific amount of time prior to a visual inspection for leaks. For pipelines, the pipeline is removed from service before testing, all oil or natural gas is vented off, and the line is mechanically cleaned prior to hydrostatic testing.

Liquid Penetrant Examination

Liquid penetrant examination (LPE) is an NDE inspection method that uses fluorescent dye. It is one of the easiest and most common inspection techniques in the industry. The process is able to reveal surface flaws on parts and equipment which might not otherwise be visible. The technique works via the principle of “capillary action.” A process where a liquid flows into a narrow space without help from gravity.

Magnetic Particle Testing

Magnetic particle testing (MPT) is a nondestructive inspection technique for detecting surface and slight subsurface flaws. It works on most ferromagnetic materials such as iron, nickel, and cobalt along with some of their alloys. The process involves magnetizing materials to reveal flaws that would not normally be visible. The process works by running a magnetic current through the component. Any cracks or defects in the material will interrupt the flow of current, create a “flux leakage field.” Metal particles flow over the component and congregate around the fields.

If you're interested in learning more about magnetic particle testing, Inspectioneering has created a free resource on the subject. Click here to download our Asset Intelligence Report: A Primer on Magnetic Particle Testing. 

Magnetic Flux Leakage

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) is a NDE technique that uses electromagnetism. It works by using magnets to temporarily magnetize a pipe before examining and analyzing the pipe's magnetic field for distortions. If there are any major flaws in the pipe wall then the magnetic field will distort. By identifying these distortions, it is possible to find flaws within the pipe.

Some other common inspection techniques include pulsed eddy current testing, and acoustic emission testing. Each type of inspection has its own strengths and weaknesses. The effectiveness of any inspection technique is dependant on the specific equipment, environment, and situation.

Relevant Links


Special thanks to the following contributors:

Mohammed Aboul Gheit, KNPC, MAA

Recommend changes or revisions to this definition.


Join 8,000+ fellow asset integrity professionals! Get Inspectioneering's latest information straight to your inbox. Enter your information below:

September/October 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Nick Harwood at Aetos Group, and Aaron Cook at Aetos Group

This article is intended to provide some helpful insights when it comes to Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs), and to hopefully put you on the path to safer and more cost-effective inspections utilizing UAS technologies.

SAFER Inspectioneering
September/October 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Paul J. Ramirez at NASA - Jet Propulsion Laboratory

The Quality Assurance Engineer (QAE) provides a safety net for mission-critical hardware. The variety and complexity of hardware, and the many dimensions of the QA inspection process, combine in such a manner that even the most experienced QAE may miss problems.

September/October 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Shana Telesz at GE Measurement & Control

While computed tomography (CT) scans are common and well-known as a critical evaluation tool in the medical field, they are becoming increasingly important in industrial settings. Recent automation, speed, and accuracy developments are driving the migration of CT technology onto the production floor.

Recording Thickness Data During Thickness Monitoring Inspections
September/October 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By A.C. Gysbers at The Equity Engineering Group, Inc.

This article addresses a debate mechanical integrity professionals in the O&G and Chemical Processing industries periodically have about how thickness data gathered during a thickness monitoring inspection (TMI) should be recorded.

Do You Know Your Facility’s Pressure Vessel to Inspector Ratio?
October 21, 2015

Toward the end of last year, Inspectioneering conducted a survey with the goal of answering the following question: "How many pressure vessels do facilities have compared to the number of inspectors responsible for them?"

Assess Your Mechanical Integrity Program with Material Testing and Inspection
Partner Content

Material testing can be applied at any stage of the production process, but the emphasis should always be to reduce risk as early as possible. Coupled with robust inspection procedures...

Where Do I Set My Risk Threshold?
September/October 2007 Inspectioneering Journal
By Greg Alvarado at Inspectioneering Journal

In my travels around the world as one of the primary API RBI 580/581 training course instructors the question always comes up, “What risk threshold or tolerable risk should I be using?” and “If I do not have one, how can I implement RBI?”

5 Major Fixed Equipment Mechanical Integrity Failures –  What Happened and Why?
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By John Reynolds at Intertek

Rarely is there a new and unknown cause of a major Fixed Equipment Mechanical Integrity (FEMI) failure in the petrochemical and refining industry. This article briefly summarizes five major fixed equipment mechanical integrity (FEMI) failures from the petrochemical and refining industry.

In-Service Inspections Using EMAT and MRUT
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Borja Lopez at Innerspec Technologies, Inc.

Readers were previously introduced to some of the practical advantages of EMAT Ultrasonic Testing (UT) in the March/April 2013 and July/August 2013 issues of Inspectioneering Journal. In this article, I will cover the practical advantages of EMAT for in-service applications using Medium Range Ultrasonic Testing (MRUT).

A Guide to Storage Tank Inspection
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Robert Frater at Engineering & Inspection Services, LLC

Refinery, petrochemical, and storage tank operators are responsible for properly cleaning facility tanks on a periodic maintenance basis, typically in 20 to 30 year increments. This article provides a suggested “checklist” of inspection activities to ensure safe and reliable operations after cleaning.

API 1169 Pipeline Inspector Certification Program –  A Case for Why it Should be the Industry Standard
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Rikki Smith at Oilfield Jobs

Some hiring practices for new employees have been too lax for too long in the pipeline industry. Pipeline inspectors who have ever worked beside someone who was hired via the familiar “friends and family program,” recognize the need for more stringent hiring requirements than just knowing the right person.

In-Place Pipe Support Load Testing & Hanger Surveys – Part of a Best in Class Fitness-for-Service Program
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Lange Kimball at Stress Engineering Services, Joe Frey, PE at Stress Engineering, Inc., and Britt Bettell at Stress Engineering Services

This article introduces portions of a “Best-In-Class” Fitness-for-Service (FFS) program that includes the performance of regular visual inspections of pipe supports and hangers, coupled with in-situ load testing of suspect supports. This program can give the plant engineer the knowledge he needs to make sound operational and maintenance decisions.

Maintenance Strategies for Aboveground Storage Tanks in Crude Oil Service - Part 1
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Melissa Ramkissoon at Petrotrin

Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) are essential to any successful oil and gas operation and must be properly managed to ensure operations function in a safe and reliable manner. In this 2-part series, I will identify some common failures related to ASTs in crude oil service and recommend strategies to prevent and/or mitigate such failures.

Partner Content

Experienced, well-trained engineers can be an invaluable asset to any operation. Whether it’s performing a reliability review or a root cause failure analysis, having access to experienced and knowledgeable personnel could mean the difference between success and failure.

Online Article
June 29, 2015

A new memorandum released by OSHA provides a list of 16 enforcement considerations that will be considered by an inspector when evaluating whether an employer is meeting the RAGAGEP requirements under the PSM standard. Here are 8 tips for addressing OSHA's new enforcement guidance.

Repair Strategies for Civil Structures Utilizing New Risk Based Inspection Methodology
May/June 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Amanda Nurse at BP, and Josh Havekost at BP

Assessing risk is an integral part of working at a refinery. Infrastructure supporting the miles of piping, process vessels, and the platforms and ladders used in daily unit operations are often taken for granted. The Civil Structures Management Program (CSMP) at the BP Whiting Refinery was developed in 2004. Since the program’s inception, millions of dollars have been spent in the yearly execution of refinery structural repairs.

Gains with Advanced Data Assessment in ILI: Leveraging pipeline data to eliminate risk, prioritize and schedule necessary repairs
May/June 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Ian D. Smith, P.Eng. at Quest Integrity Group, and Michael McGee at Quest Integrity Group

For traditional in-line inspection (ILI) vendors, considering 21.4 miles of a piggable 4” diesel pipeline is typically not a big deal. However, significant threats like 3rd party damage and external corrosion seem to come with the territory in nearly any pipeline territory.