Inspectioneering Journal

In-Place Pipe Support Load Testing & Hanger Surveys – Part of a Best in Class Fitness-for-Service Program

By Lange Kimball, Sr. Piping Engineer at Stress Engineering Services, Joe Frey, PE, Power Practice Lead Engineer at Stress Engineering, Inc., and Britt Bettell, API 570/580 Inspector at Stress Engineering Services. This article appears in the July/August 2015 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.


Unless the plant engineer knows what he has, how can he be assured that his critical piping systems aren’t imposing potentially damaging loads and stresses on his equipment if not on the piping itself? Piping Codes provide guidance for the operation and maintenance of piping systems and pipe hangers and supports. But is it enough? This article introduces portions of a “Best-In-Class” Fitness-for-Service (FFS) program that includes the performance of regular visual inspections of pipe supports and hangers, coupled with in-situ load testing of suspect supports. Such a program will help give the plant engineer the knowledge he or she needs to make sound operational and maintenance decisions.

A best in class FFS program for piping systems has 5 major steps. They include:

  1. Collect and review design, operating, maintenance and inspection history of the piping system;

  2. System walk down in both the hot and cold condition, and design verification;

  3. As-Found pipe linear elastic stress analysis;

  4. Creep stress analysis; and

  5. Appropriate inspections and testing. With this information at hand, the plant engineer has verifiable information that will help him maintain his piping as safely and reliably as possible.

The first two steps described above involve performing regular pipe support surveys aimed at documenting the visual condition of the pipe and supports. If pipe supports are in distress, it generally means that the associated piping is in distress. However, not all pipe supports that appear to be operating normally are. Spring hangers may be aged or internally fouled and rigid rod hangers located in critical locations may not be carrying the design loads. Without this actual operating data, the analyses may provide erroneous results. In-situ pipe support load testing allows the operator to physically determine the load and operability of the hanger without uncoupling the support from the pipe. The testing can even be done online.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

Posted by Kiriti Bhattacharya on October 8, 2015
Good reminder of essential basics. The one thing... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.