Inspectioneering Journal

MI Inspection During Capital Projects Promotes PSM Compliance, Corrosion Rate Accuracy and Improved Budgeting

By Paul F. Schubert, Ph.D. at SGS North America Industrial Services, and Travis Keener, P.E., Global Asset Integrity Management (AIM) Technical Advisor at SGS North America Industrial Services. This article appears in the May/June 2011 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.


Putting off the initial inspection (i.e. baseline) of piping and vessels in a new process unit is both common and problematic. The tendency of owners is to rely on the nominal thickness because the actual original thickness was either not measured or not recorded for calculating corrosion rates after the first wave of thickness readings are taken with the equipment having been in service for some period of time. Consequently, significant errors in calculated corrosion rates may result from variations of thickness allowed by mill tolerance standards during fabrication. Not having the original thickness can mask potentially hazardous conditions, or cause concern where none is really warranted. Involvement of the inspection department in a capital project can significantly improve quality, reduce cost, and ensure compliance. The objectives of this paper are to provide: 1) justification for inspection during capital projects; 2) show effective roles for inspection departments in capital projects; 3) justification for performing vendor surveillance in capital projects; and 4) the technical advantages for performing pre-service baseline inspections.

1. The Need for Inspection in Capital Projects

In a recent project involving initial on-stream inspection of four new process units which had been on stream for less than two years we inspected approximately 150 pressure vessels and heat exchangers. Out of these equipment items, we found 22 instances where the wrong thickness of material was utilized during fabrication. A thickness survey at the fabrication facility would have probably prevented these fabrication errors. This discrepancy between the specified equipment and the actual installed equipment highlights the need for inspection as part of the original capital project. In fact, there are several drivers for including inspection in capital projects including regulatory requirements, improved QA/QC, more effective vendor surveillance programs, and more effective budgeting.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.