Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

How Inferior UT Procedures and Practices on Pressure Vessels Cost $1 Million in Turnaround Repairs

Case Study: Part 1 of 2

By Dave Holthaus, Co-Founder at Comprehensive Procedure Reviews, LLC (CPR), and Kevin Gaskin, Quality Assurance Manager at CHS, Inc.. This article appears in the November/December 2019 issue of Inspectioneering Journal
17
Likes
This article is part 1 of a 2-part series.
Part 1 | Part 2

Introduction

The ultrasonic testing method is an excellent volumetric diagnostic tool for examining ASME pressure vessel welds. As with any non-destructive examination (NDE) method, the application must be performed properly in order to provide reliable and accurate results. This case study is intended to provide a more user-friendly explanation of a presentation that was given during the 7th Biennial API Inspection Summit, entitled, “Unreliable UT Examination of Category ‘D’ Nozzle Welds”. The purpose of this case study is to shine light on some very common industry problems that can be fixed with a better understanding of what is actually required.

This discussion is an attempt to explain, in very simple terms, key ultrasonic principles that govern the examination. The following discussion will address the discrepant areas which have been identified in this case study.

30 days prior to a major turn-around, delivery was taken on eight ASME Section VIII, Div. 1, pressure vessels. During the fabrication process, all the Category “D” nozzle welds required ultrasonic examination per the requirements of Appendix 12 of Section VIII, Div. 1 ASME Code. Upon delivery to the job site, receipt inspection revealed seven of the eight vessels contained poor workmanship with rejectable defects in the Category “D” nozzle welds. A total of 57 nozzle repairs were needed prior to placing the vessels into service. The discrepant areas identified in this case study are as follows:

  • Inadequately written UT procedures
  • Improper and poor implementation of the UT procedures
  • Inadequate UT reporting
  • Poorly trained UT examiners

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Pemmaraju Raghavendra on December 26, 2019
Good topic, common mistakes done by mediocre... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Dave Holthaus on December 27, 2019
Thank you for your comments. We still have a... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Loren Gurr on January 7, 2020
I do find it interesting that many sites require... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Dave Holthaus on January 7, 2020
Thank you for your comment. I agree that more... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Dana Baham on February 24, 2020
This is a very common issue, not only in the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Allan Hodgson on February 24, 2020
I agree with all of the posted comments, that... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Job Postings

Discover job opportunities that match your skillset.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.