Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

The Use of Miniature Test Specimens in Fitness-for-Service Evaluation

By Douglas Marriott, Staff Consultant at Stress Engineering Services Inc., Shannon Read, Staff Consultant at Stress Engineering Services Inc., and Arun Sreeranganathan, Senior Associate at Stress Engineering Services Inc. This article appears in the May/June 2016 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
4 Likes

Introduction

Aging equipment, along with more aggressive service, makes it more important than ever to carry out fitness-for-service (FFS) assessments in support of run/repair/replace decisions. Testing material in the service-degraded condition enables quantification of the material condition and provides increased accuracy in FFS evaluations of these components. Depending on the service and material, properties of interest to a plant engineer include, but are not limited to, (a) tensile properties; (b) creep properties; (c) and fracture toughness. In addition, it is often desirable to gain an understanding of the microstructural condition of service-aged components as microstructural damage is often a precursor to catastrophic failures. While field metallographic replication (FMR) is often used in order to examine the surface microstructure of in-service components, the technique lacks the resolution needed to identify incipient damage, such as voids due to creep and/or high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA).

Small specimen testing, which involves removal of small amounts of material that do not require post-removal repair of the component (or requiring minimal repair) and subsequent testing, is aimed at addressing this problem. Boat and scoop sampling techniques allow for minimally invasive extraction of material from in-service components. Small scale testing may also be beneficial in cases where the objective is to characterize distinct microstructural regions, such as the heat-affected zone (HAZ), in a weldment. However, the small amount of material that is available at one’s disposal necessitates the adoption of novel specimen geometries and test procedures, which can be more effective than existing standard methods in evaluating the specific material parameters needed in FFS studies. A number of such specimens and tests for measuring short-term mechanical, long-term creep, and fracture properties will be described in this article.

Scoop Sampling

Scoop sampling refers to the removal of lens-shaped samples from a component for additional testing. Typically, this involves pressure-containing equipment in the context of refining and petrochemical industry. This sampling technique leaves behind a relatively smooth surface that requires minimal or no repair, as long as the minimum wall thickness requirement is not violated, or the local thin area (LTA) left behind is deemed fit for service. Scoop sampling has been around since late 1980’s, but has gained wider acceptance in the industry only within the last few years with advances in technology allowing for increased availability, portability, and faster cutting speeds.  Figure 1 shows a scoop sampler removing material from the ID surface of a pressure vessel, as well as the sample that was removed, and the vessel wall after removal showing the concave depression left behind. The smooth contour of the scooped region requires minimal buffing, if any, to avoid geometric stress raisers. A pneumatically powered and cooled scoop cutter allows for a cutting time of about 20 minutes, while at the same time increases the life of the cutting blades. Samples can be extracted with depths of over 1”, and 4” in diameter depending on the minimum wall requirements.

Figure 1. Photographs showing (a) scoop sampler in operation; (b) concave depression left behind in the vessel after sample removal; and (c) scoop sample.
Figure 1. Photographs showing (a) scoop sampler in operation; (b) concave depression left behind in the vessel after sample removal; and (c) scoop sample.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.