Inspectioneering Journal

Engineering Critical Assessment of a Service-Damaged Pressure Vessel Under Sour Service Conditions

By John Bowker at Materials Technology Laboratory, and Russell Orr at Metals Technologies Laboratories, CANMET. This article appears in the May/June 2001 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
1 Like

The use of engineering critical assessment (ECA) of “fitness for service”, for the evaluation of flaws and local wall thinning in pressure vessels is receiving a lot of attention in the petrochemical and utility industries. A rigorous methodology based on fracture mechanics and accurate flaw sizing can be used to assess the risk of operation of a damaged vessel by predicting the amount of damage that can lead to premature failure.

In Canada, a cooperative program between Materials Technology Laboratory, a division of Natural Resources Canada and several representative organizations from the petroleum, gas transmission and electrical utility industries has been conducted. Its aim was to promote the acceptance of an ECA methodology for service damaged pressure vessels by the various codes and regulatory bodies.

Phase 1, featured the hydrostatic burst test of a damaged vessel under sweet conditions (1-2) and has been reported in a previous issue of this journal (3). The results of the hydrostatic burst test carried out in Phase 1 showed that the test vessel failed at about 5 times the design pressure in spite of the presence of extensive imperfections. The fracture mechanics analyses, both simple and complex, gave a conservative prediction of burst pressure.

The second phase has featured the hydrostatic burst of a damaged pressure vessel under wet sour gas conditions. The vessel, a sour glycol separator, shown schematically in Figure 1, was fabricated in 1973 according to ASME codes. It was 5.72 m (18'-9") in length and 1.52 m (5'-0") inside diameter, with a measured wall thickness of 33.5 mm (1.32"). The vessel was post weld heat treated after fabrication in accordance with the ASME code.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.