Inspectioneering Journal

Corrosion Control Documents: One High Priority Approach to Minimizing Failures of Fixed Equipment

By John Reynolds, Principal Consultant at Intertek. This article appears in the September/October 2012 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.


For those who have finished reading all ten articles on the necessary Pressure Equipment Integrity & Reliability (PEI&R) Management Systems recently published in the Inspectioneering Journal1-10, you already know that there is not just “one key” to minimizing failures of fixed equipment in a process plant. There are 101 essential elements of maintaining PEI&R11 and Ten PEI&R Management Systems1 to make sure that they all stay under control. But one primary key stands out as a critical foundation block in the PEI&R work process. In those previous articles in the Inspectioneering Journal, I mentioned several of the most important work processes that can be accomplished in order to minimize the chances of unanticipated failures/leaks/ruptures of fixed equipment from in-service damage mechanisms. But perhaps the most important work process to achieve success in fixed equipment PEI&R is to create Corrosion Control Documents (CCD’s)4 for each process unit. In this article, I expand upon that work process in order to guide the interested owner-user in creating CCD’s for their process units.

So what is a CCD? A CCD is basically a document that tells readers almost everything they need know about the mechanical integrity of fixed equipment in a process unit. Its purpose is to help owner-users avoid unexpected deterioration of materials of construction and demonstrate how to manage corrosion and other damage mechanisms that afflict fixed equipment in service. One way to think of it is that it takes the type of generic information available in API RP 57112 and creates another document that is very specific to the chemistry and degradation mechanisms in each process unit in a manufacturing plant or refinery. While API RP 571 is an excellent document covering (in brief) nearly every damage mechanism known to refining and petrochemical manufacturing, knowledgeable technical people need to translate the useful generic information in that standard into more useful information as it applies to each specific process unit.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.