Inspectioneering Journal

A New Trend for Pipeline Integrity Management: How GIS and Risk-Based Asset Management (RBA) Integration Can Improve Pipeline Management

By Dylan Schrader, Solutions Engineer at Pinnacle, Tom Pickthall at EnhanceCo Inc., and Carlos A. Palacios at CiMA-TQ. This article appears in the May/June 2015 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.


Pipeline integrity is critical to ensure maintenance and operational efficiency; however it is becoming an increasingly challenging task for the energy industry. Maintenance managers and inspectors must make sure their pipeline(s) and its associated equipment meet strict integrity requirements and comply with regulations in order to avoid unnecessary downtime and mitigate safety and environmental risks. They must do this while working with increasingly tight budgets.

Any breach of integrity, such as loss of containment, could result in major consequences for a company, including costs from lawsuits and environmental violations, safety hazards, toxic risks for local communities, loss of revenue, damage to the relationship with their client, and a complete shutdown of the pipeline altogether.

Pipeline integrity management relies heavily on current pipeline data and information. For data consistency among operators, Pipeline Open Data Standards1 (PODS) has been developed and is being adopted as the data architecture frame of reference. Yet, management still has many concerns, such as how to ensure the information and data are readily accessible so the operator can make better-informed repair and replacement decisions. Also, how to ensure the associated inspection and maintenance tasks have been accomplished safely, efficiently, and effectively?

For many pipeline operators, the answer to these questions is quite complex. New pipeline integrity management requirements are having an immediate impact on record-keeping and data management and analysis for pipeline operators. Records must now be traceable, verifiable, and complete. If not, response to an emergency or a regulatory audit could spell disaster for the company.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

Posted by Julian Muirhead on June 25, 2015
In 2011 I was given a demonstration of a very... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.