Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

System Integrity Verification Through Pressure Testing - Hydrotest and Pneumatic Test Limitations and Solutions

By Qasem Fandem, Engineering Specialist at Saudi Aramco, Adeeb Hindas, Engineering Specialist at Saudi Aramco, and Abdulrahman Zarah, Supervisor of Project Inspection at Saudi Aramco. This article appears in the March/April 2024 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
29 Likes

Introduction

Pressure testing is intended to be a nondestructive method to verify mechanical integrity of metallic and non-metallic objects such as pressure vessels and piping systems. When pressure tested, the object is  subjected to a high enough internal pressure under controlled conditions so as to demonstrate the ability to contain pressure without leaking, thereby inferring mechanical integrity. Pressure testing is required by various codes for a new pressure system before use, or an existing pressure system after fabrication and repair to ensure that a pressure vessel or piping system can perform at its rated pressure with no leaks. Pressure tests are performed either with liquid/water (hydrostatic), or with gas (pneumatic). The most widely used codes for pressure and leak testing are ASME B31 Pressure Piping Code and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code [1].

It is important to note that passing a pressure test only affirms that the part under test is not leaking during the test. It is not necessarily indicative of overall mechanical integrity, nor future conditions and performance.

Pressure Testing Methods

In the oil and gas petrochemical industries, there are two common pressure testing methods: hydrostatic testing and pneumatic testing. Hydrostatic testing is the most often used method for system integrity or leak-testing, which has lower safety restrictions than pneumatic testing. In addition, water is considered safer than air because it is nearly incompressible and therefore contains much less stored energy as compared to pneumatic testing. In other words, the required work to compress water at a specific pressure in a piping system is significantly less than the required work to compress air at the same pressure [2]. The implementation of hydrostatic testing and pneumatic testing methods are described below.

Hydrotest Method

In a hydrostatic test, the system being tested is filled with water or other non-hazardous liquid (if allowed by applicable code) and pressurized gradually until the required test pressure is reached. Upon reaching the test pressure, the system under pressure test is held for a suitable time but not less than the minimum time specified by the applicable code, and then visually checked for leakage using calibrated pressure gauges with visual inspection. In the case of no leakage or pressure drop, a hydrostatic test is considered acceptable [3].

Normally, the hydrotest pressure is 1.5 times the design pressure of the system, unless limited by flanges, valves, or other component in the system. The hydrostatic strength test pressure for every system should produce a hoop stress of 90% of the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS) at the test temperature. Moreover, the test pressure duration usually takes at least 30 minutes for aboveground tested systems and 2 hours for exposed underground systems to determine that there are no leaks.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Juan Maria Pinasco on July 2, 2024
What is your opinion regarding to perform the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Ali Alshehri on July 16, 2024
Very thoughtful and thorough article! thanks... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.