Inspectioneering Journal

To Test or Not to Test: A Comparison of the Pressure Testing Requirements between ASME B31.3 and ASME Section VIII, Division 1

By Serge Bisson, Piping and Pressure Vessel Engineer at Norda Stelo, and Hugo Julien, P.E., Mechanical Integrity Group Manager at GCM Consultants. This article appears in the January/February 2015 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.

Are you still hitting the welded joints of pressure vessels with a hammer during hydrostatic testing? If yes, then you’re due for a refresher on the pressure testing requirements of ASME Section VIII Division 1 since this requirement was for pressure vessels back in the mid 1940’s. This article will help you by highlighting the main requirements of, and differences between, the hydrostatic test for new pressure vessels fabricated according to ASME Section VIII, Division 1 and the hydrostatic leak test for new piping systems made under ASME B31.3. Since it is the most popular way to test a pressure vessel or piping system, the focus of this article will be on the hydrostatic test, article UG-99 of Section VIII Division 1 (2013 Edition), and the hydrostatic leak test, paragraphs 345 & 345.4 of B31.3 (2012 Edition). Please refer to these Codes and their interpretations for the complete requirements. Moreover, verification with the local jurisdiction is essential to ensure that their requirements are not stricter than those of the Codes.

Pressure testing during the fabrication process

In Section VIII Division 1, the hydrostatic test is considered the final step in the fabrication of a pressure vessel before the application of the U-code symbol stamp. The test has to be done after completion of the vessel, after all pre-test examinations have been performed and, when required, after post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). Note that a preliminary hydrostatic test prior to the PWHT is allowed to prevent an additional PWHT cycle when repairs are required following an unsuccessful hydrostatic test. For pressure vessels that cannot be safely filled with liquid or adequately dried when used in a service that cannot tolerate the test liquid, the alternative to a hydrostatic test is a pneumatic test as described in UG-100. The code requires special care for this type of test considering the amount of energy stored in compressed gas. The other alternative for vessels or vessel parts that cannot be accurately calculated is a proof test that follows UG-101.

Vessels can be tested either in the vertical or horizontal position, independent of the in-service position. When vessels are made of multiple parts, welded or bolted, the parts can be hydrostatically tested independently and U-Part stamped, but they must be tested assembled before the application of the U-Code symbol stamp for the whole unit.

As in Section VIII Div. 1, ASME B31.3 requires that all new piping systems, defined by the code as “interconnected piping subject to the same set or sets of design conditions,” be subject to a hydrostatic leak test before initial operation. This has to be done after any heat treatment and code required examinations, excluding owner-specified examination.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

Posted by Kiriti Bhattacharya on April 22, 2015
What kind of gaskets are used for the hydrotest... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Serge Bisson on April 28, 2015
Kiriti, It is recommended to use the same kind... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Harold Babuik on February 15, 2016
For B31.3 Piping, the hydrostatic test pressure... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Serge Bisson on February 16, 2016
Hi Harold, Thank you for your comment. You are... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Gerald Eckard on July 25, 2019
ASME B31.3 / 326.3 states, "The design,... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Harold Babuik on July 27, 2019
There is a interpretation in B31.3 regarding... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Gerald Eckard on July 27, 2019
Thanks for your reply, Harold! Very detailed and... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.