Inspectioneering Journal

Advanced Methods for More Accurate Brittle Fracture Screening Assessments

By Brian R. Macejko, P.E., Team Lead for the Mechanical & Structural Engineering Team at The Equity Engineering Group, Inc., Seetha Ramudu Kummari, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Engineer II at The Equity Engineering Group, Inc., and Phillip E. Prueter, Principal Engineer II and Senior Vice President of Consulting at The Equity Engineering Group, Inc. This article appears in the May/June 2020 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.

Most pressure equipment utilized in the refining and petrochemical industry is constructed of carbon or low alloy steel where metal temperature highly influences the fracture toughness. At low temperatures, the material tends to behave in a brittle manner, making it much more susceptible to fracture. Pressure vessels, piping, and tanks may experience low temperatures from the ambient environment or from operating and upset conditions. An engineering evaluation is typically required to determine permissible pressure-temperature limits. Unfortunately, significant inconsistencies and inadequacies exist in the current brittle fracture screening procedures in the various ASME and API design codes and standards as well as the 2016 edition of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service (API 579).[1] This article provides an overview and discussion on brittle fracture (including details regarding several industry failures) along with a brief summary of deficiencies and concerns with current published methods for screening susceptibility of equipment to potential brittle fracture failures. Lastly, this article will provide details and a case study example demonstrating the benefits of implementing a fracture mechanics approach to establish safe operating limits.


Brittle fracture is the sudden, rapid propagation of a crack-like flaw under stress (residual or applied) where the material exhibits little or no evidence of ductility or plastic deformation.[2] This definition outlines the three key components that drive susceptibility to brittle fracture failures in carbon and low alloy steels:

  • Crack-like defect: Brittle fracture typically initiates at a crack-like defect. Defects can result from environmental damage (such as wet H2S or caustic exposure), mechanical damage (such as gouges, dents, or fatigue), or from original fabrication (such as laminations, lack of fusion, lack of penetration, slag inclusions, porosity, etc.). Performing a detailed inspection including both surface examination techniques (such as dye penetrant examination or magnetic particle examination) and volumetric examination techniques (such as angle beam ultrasonic examination methods) can be utilized to detect and characterize any crack-like defects present in pressure equipment.
  • Stress (residual and/or applied): Stress provides the energy necessary to drive a defect to fracture. Typical sources for stress include pressure, weight, and thermal loads, in addition to residual stress from the welding processes. A properly designed and executed post weld heat treatment (PWHT) stress relief operation will significantly reduce weld residual stress.
  • Material fracture toughness: Fracture toughness is the ability of a material to absorb energy and plastically deform without fracturing. It is a function of both the material strength and ductility. As previously noted, for carbon and low alloy steel, toughness is also a function of metal temperature. In Figure 1, absorbed energy is plotted against test temperature to demonstrate the transition from brittle-to-ductile behavior. Absorbed energy is typically measured using a Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact test.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

Posted by Rob Salvatore on July 27, 2020
Hi EEG team. Any recommendations for how to treat... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Brian Macejko on August 1, 2020
This is an excellent question. Thank you for... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.