Inspectioneering
Blog

A Quick Review of Recent OSHA PSM Citations

By Nick Schmoyer at Inspectioneering. January 3, 2019

Last week we published OSHA's top 10 safety and health violations for 2018. In this article, we're going to focus specifically on violations related to the Process Safety Management (PSM) standard. If you weren't aware, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) provides a vast amount of raw data related to OSHA activities (inspections, violations, etc.) directly through their website. One can find lists of OSHA citations, as well as those that stem specifically from PSM.

What follows is a quick summary of 2016-2017 OSHA violation data pulled directly from the DOL website. Only citations related to the PSM standard (1910.119) were considered. Caveat emptor: there is no guarantee that this data is completely accurate, and as those in the world of finance like to say, past performance is not indicative of future results.

The first chart shows PSM citations in 2016 and 2017 by section/paragraph. Overall, there were significantly less citations in 2017 (653 citations) compared to 2016 (1,009 citations). That’s a 35% drop in year-over-year citations. In both years, Mechanical Integrity (paragraph J) is the most-cited, followed by Process Safety Information (paragraph D).

OSHA PSM Citations in 2016 and 2017 by Section
Figure 1. OSHA PSM Citations in 2016 and 2017 by Section

The second chart focuses specifically on Mechanical Integrity citations. The most cited subsection in both years was Inspection and Testing, followed by Written Procedures. While there was an overall drop in MI-related citations, their relative frequencies hardly changed.

OSHA PSM Mechanical Integrity Citations in 2016 and 2017
Figure 2. OSHA PSM Mechanical Integrity Citations in 2016 and 2017

And finally, the following chart further narrows the data to only Inspection and Testing citations. For reference, the full descriptions of each of the Inspection and Testing subsections are:

  • (j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests shall be performed on process equipment.
  • (j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures shall follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.
  • (j)(4)(iii): The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment shall be consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience.
  • (j)(4)(iv): The employer shall document each inspection and test that has been performed on process equipment. The documentation shall identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test.
OSHA PSM Inspection and Testing Citations in 2016 and 2017
Figure 3. OSHA PSM Inspection and Testing Citations in 2016 and 2017

 


Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Job Postings

Discover job opportunities that match your skillset.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.

Asset Intelligence Reports

Download brief primers on various asset integrity management topics.

Videos

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.