Pulsed Eddy Current (PEC) is a nondestructive examination technique used for detecting flaws or corrosion in ferrous materials or measuring the thickness of objects.
The principles of eddy current testing were first laid out in 1831. This was the year with Michael Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction. Eight years later these basic principals led to a new discovery. Researchers discovered that the properties of a coil would change when placed in contact with metals of different connectivity and permeability. It wasn't until World War II that these principles found practical use though.
PEC works using the principle of electromagnetic induction. When applying step function voltage to a conductor, a magnetic field develops around it. This field changes in intensity as the current alternates. If brought close to the first field, another conductor will have a current induced in it as well. If there are any flaws in this material then the eddy current will distort. In the case of PEC, the first conductor is an eddy current probe. The second is the test material.
The main advantage of PEC over conventional eddy current is that it contains a continuum of frequencies. Because of this, it is possible to measure the electromagnetic response to several different frequencies can with just a single step. Information from a range of depths can be obtained all at once.
PEC can be done without need for contact with the surface of the material. Because of this, it can be useful in situations where an object’s surface is rough or inaccessible. This method also doesn’t require surface preparation or removing any insulation. It can be a quick and cost-effective solution for corrosion detection.
PEC is widely used for a number of applications. These include both measuring the thickness of steels and detecting corrosion. It can be used on materials as diverse as vessels, columns, storage tanks and spheres, piping systems, and structural applications with fireproofing. Furthermore, it can be used on both insulated and uninsulated materials.
Is this definition incomplete? You can help by contributing to it.
|
May/June 2015 Inspectioneering Journal
By Vibha Zaman, P.E. at Asset Optimization Consultants, and Peter Dsouza at LyondellBasell
Direct assessment is often seen as the best option to verify pipeline integrity. But, it's particularly challenging due to the difficulty of pipeline access, as well as the limitations in available technology to perform subsea wall thickness inspections. Addressing these challenges requires action rather than reaction. |
|
Blog
June 1, 2015 By Nick Schmoyer at Inspectioneering
Nondestructive Testing (NDT) makes up the majority of testing performed in our industry. There many different types of nondestructive testing techniques. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages; each can detect different types of flaws. Some are simple to perform, others are difficult. Some are used on several different types of equipment, others are more restricted. |
|
September/October 2013 Inspectioneering Journal
By Sam Ternowchek at Mistras Group
Maintaining the mechanical integrity of above ground storage tanks (AST’s) is the focal point of tank inspection programs. Performing internal inspections is an integral part of a tank integrity program, however, deciding when to take a tank out of service to perform an internal inspection is not an easy determination to make. |
|
September/October 2004 Inspectioneering Journal
By Greg Alvarado at Inspectioneering Journal
Exactly two years ago, an interview with John Nyholt appeared in the “IJ”. New ground will be covered in this interchange. We at the IJ thought it might be valuable to spend some time chatting about his background, challenges he has faced recently and what he feels are some of the biggest challenges ahead for the Inspectioneering® community. |
