Inspectioneering

Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)

Explore this topic

Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) is an advanced nondestructive testing (NDT) technique commonly used in the oil & gas and chemical processing industries to inspect for wall loss and sharp defects such as pitting, grooving, and circumferential cracks in ferromagnetic materials (most commonly pipelines and storage tanks).

History and Development

The practice of inspecting pipelines using “smart” inspection devices (also known as a smart pig) came about in 1964 when the first in-line inspection (ILI) tool was equipped with MFL inspection technology. During the 1970s, the first “high-resolution” pigs were developed. These tools were capable of detecting pipeline defects more accurately and reliably. During the 1980s, more MFL ILI technologies emerged in the form of ultrasonic wall thickness measurement tools. During the 1990s, ultrasonic crack detection and circumferential MFL tools capable of detecting narrow axially oriented defects (including open cracks) were developed. During the 2000s, technologies improved in ways that made them capable of accurately detecting and sizing a more diverse range of pipeline anomalies.

Methodology

Magnetic flux leakage uses electromagnetism to inspect for flaws or material degradation in steel components and structures. MFL utilizes magnets to temporarily magnetize the part, and if flaws are present, the magnetic field created will show distortions, signaling the presence of things like corrosion, pitting, and wall loss. MFL is useful because it's highly portable and an effective technique for detecting subsurface cracks. On the other hand, if the defects are too deep in the material, MFL may not be able to detect them.

Magnetic flux leakage is not a quantitative NDT method because it only reports areas where material loss is detected. As a follow-up, other NDT methods like ultrasonic thickness testing may be necessary to verify the MFL findings and determine the severity and extent of any material loss detected.

A representation of a general MFL setup and the effects of magnetic flux on a flaw tube.
A representation of a general MFL setup and the effects of magnetic flux on a flaw tube.

Industry Applications

Magnetic flux leakage is commonly used for inspecting pipelines and storage tanks in the oil & gas industry; however, the technique can be applied to assets in other industrial sectors. In fact, MFL is the oldest and most commonly used ILI technique for pipelines due to its ability for reliably detecting—while the pipelines are in service—internal and external metal loss due to corrosion. MFL is also widely used for detecting flaws and corrosion in above ground storage tank floors.

References

  1. Ellinger, M., 2017, “A History of In-Line Inspection Tools,” Inspectioneering Journal, The Woodlands, Texas.

Related Topics

Relevant Links

Topic Tools

Share this Topic

Contribute to Definition

We welcome updates to this Integripedia definition from the Inspectioneering community. Click the link below to submit any recommended changes for Inspectioneering's team of editors to review.

Contribute to Definition
Articles about Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)
November/December 2023 Inspectioneering Journal

A comparative analysis of robotic nondestructive inspection tools used to locate floor defects in aboveground storage tanks.

Blog

Nondestructive testing (NDT) careers are on the rise in today’s economy. These fields are constantly advancing, and there is an ever-growing need for technicians, quality assurance specialists and inspectors as infrastructure in the United States...

Authors: Berg Engineering
November/December 2017 Inspectioneering Journal

This article explains the Statistically Active Corrosion Assessment, which is a tool for determining appropriate and realistic corrosion growth rates which can assist pipeline operators in optimizing the value of in-line inspection data.

March/April 2017 Inspectioneering Journal

The purpose of this article is to describe the various in-line inspection (ILI) technologies that are currently available to the market. The pros, cons, and applicability of each type of tool will be discussed in greater detail.

Authors: Matt Ellinger
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal

Refinery, petrochemical, and storage tank operators are responsible for properly cleaning facility tanks on a periodic maintenance basis, typically in 20 to 30 year increments. This article provides a suggested “checklist” of inspection...

Authors: Robert Frater
Partner Content

Antea delivers highly flexible risk-based asset integrity software with 3D Digital Twin integration to optimize maintenance, reduce risk, and improve mechanical integrity for oil and gas, power generation, and chemical plants and facilities....

Blog

Nondestructive Testing (NDT) makes up the majority of testing performed in our industry. There many different types of nondestructive testing techniques. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages; each can detect different types of flaws....

Authors: Nick Schmoyer
Blog

We talk about heat exchangers quite a bit here on Inspectioneering, most recently in the January/February issue of the Journal. This is because heat exchangers are vital pieces of equipment in nearly every type of plant or facility.

September/October 2014 Inspectioneering Journal

The pigging industry has developed a tremendous range of techniques and technologies, and it is probably fair to say that there are few pipelines in the world that cannot be cleaned and inspected, although the success of such operations will often...

Authors: John Tiratsoo
January/February 2014 Inspectioneering Journal

Technicians inspecting oil & gas installations and petrochemical plants employ a wide variety of nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques. A new technology has recently been developed that utilizes a real-time portable imaging device which has...

May/June 2002 Inspectioneering Journal

We have discussed various factors that can affect the reliability of NDE techniques (i.e., probability of detection - POD and sizing accuracy) in Part 1. In general, it is difficult to quantify these uncertainties. In fact, it is impossible to fully...

    Training Courses related to Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)
      Downloads & Resources related to Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)

        Inspectioneering Journal

        Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

        Company Directory

        Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

        Training Solutions

        Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

        Case Studies

        Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

        Integripedia

        Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

        Industry News

        Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

        Blog

        Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

        Expert Interviews

        Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

        Event Calendar

        Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

        Downloads

        Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

        Videos & Webinars

        Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

        Acronyms

        Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.