Integripedia Topic
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a problem solving method used to identify potential problems (failure modes) in a design, system, or process and to determine the impact (effects) of those problems. An FMEA should answer how likely a design, process, or system is to fail, why the failure would occur, and if a failure occurs, how would it affect the surrounding environment and the safety of the operators.
The goal of an FMEA is to increase reliability, performance, and safety. FMEA also helps to prioritize deficiencies in a design or process and provides an opportunity to correct problems before they occur. Furthermore, FMEA is a practical tool for any risk assessment (e.g. risk-based inspection) and an important element in a reliability centered maintenance program.
How to Do an FMEA
The following outline is a general FMEA procedure meant to provide the minimum requirements of an FMEA. An actual FMEA may be more or less detailed depending on the significance of the project, component, process, or system. Moreover, it’s important in any analysis to develop and implement a solution and measure the results of key changes that were made during the process. Each step should be documented and organized for future failure and risk assessments.
Step 1. Identify Scope of FMEA
The first step is to define the scope of the analysis by asking the following questions:
- Is the analysis for a new design, an existing piece of equipment, a system, or a process?
- What is the purpose of the equipment, system, or process?
- What are the boundary conditions (e.g. external loads, temperature, pressure, hydraulics)?
Step 2. Determine the Cause and Effects of Failure Modes
The second step is to identify all the possible functions of the subject (i.e. component, system, process) and then determine how each of those functions may fail. These are referred to as the possible failure modes. Other methods may be used to supplement an FMEA such as a root cause analysis or a 5 Whys analysis. Once all potential failure modes are identified, the next step is to determine all possible consequences of those failures.
Step 3. Calculate the Risk Priority Number
In this step, the severity of potential failures are prioritized and the most serious problems are treated first. Failure modes are prioritized based on their Risk Priority Number (RPN). The RPN is a numerical scale that quantifies:
- The probability that the failure will happen (occurrence),
- how likely that failure will be detected before it happens (detection), and
- the significance the failure will have on personnel, equipment, and the surrounding environment (severity).
RPN is commonly represented as the product of these three factors: RPN = Occurrence x Detection x Severity.
Step 4. Develop and Implement Strategic Plan
When all failure modes have been assigned an RPN, the goal is to focus on the highest priority risks first. Next, develop a plan to make process changes, design changes, or to establish additional controls that would help mitigate the problem. Delegate tasks to members of the team and set deadlines. It’s important to record any trends as changes are made in a process and measure the results of that change. The results can be measured by re-calculating the RPN.
When to Use FMEA
An FMEA can be used on a new design, system, or process. It can also be used when modifying an existing asset or process. Furthermore, FMEA is a comprehensive failure analysis method that meets Process Hazard Analysis requirements under OSHA’s Process Safety Management standard.
When all high ranking RPN failure modes have been treated, the FMEA process can be applied again at specific intervals determined by the FMEA team.
Is this definition incomplete? You can help by contributing to it.
Topic Tools
Share this Topic
Contribute to Definition
We welcome updates to this Integripedia definition from the Inspectioneering community. Click the link below to open a form that will allow you to make adjustments to the definition and submit them to the Inspectioneering staff.
Contribute to Definition-
March/April 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Walt Sanford at Pinnacle
Today, many managers are finding that they can address the reliability of all types of assets by combining RBI and Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) processes together into one comprehensive reliability management process.
-
March/April 2012 Inspectioneering JournalBy Barry Snider at Small Hammer Incorporated
Risk Based Integrity Management (RBIM) is the latest process for developing strategies to properly operate and maintain a manufacturing or production facility in the Oil, Gas, and Petrochemical Industry (OG&P). RBIM is a significant change from...
Stress Engineering Services is an independent, employee-owned consulting engineering firm committed to engineering problem solving. With years of experience in refineries, power stations, chemical plants and pipelines, our focus is on providing engineering solutions to improve plant and refinery on-stream efficiency, safety, and reliability.
Stress Engineering Services is an independent, employee-owned consulting engineering firm committed to engineering problem solving. With years of experience in refineries, power stations, chemical plants and pipelines, our focus is on providing engineering solutions to improve plant and refinery on-stream efficiency, safety, and reliability.
Becht provides comprehensive and technically excellent engineering consulting, and project and turnaround management services to the energy, industrial gas & chemicals sectors, worldwide.
Becht provides comprehensive and technically excellent engineering consulting, and project and turnaround management services to the energy, industrial gas & chemicals sectors, worldwide.
Quest Integrity is a global leader in the development and delivery of asset integrity and reliability management services. Our integrated solutions consist of technology-enabled, advanced inspection and engineering assessment services and products that help organizations in the pipeline, refining, chemical, syngas and power industries improve operational planning, increase profitability, and reduce operational and safety risks.
Quest Integrity is a global leader in the development and delivery of asset integrity and reliability management services. Our integrated solutions consist of technology-enabled, advanced inspection and engineering assessment services and products that help organizations in the pipeline, refining, chemical, syngas and power industries improve operational planning, increase profitability, and reduce operational and safety risks.
Pinnacle builds and runs programs that empower facilities to make value-based decisions on how to manage risk, resulting in safe and profitable operations. We have gathered, organized, and analyzed more mechanical integrity and reliability data than any other company in the world.
Pinnacle builds and runs programs that empower facilities to make value-based decisions on how to manage risk, resulting in safe and profitable operations. We have gathered, organized, and analyzed more mechanical integrity and reliability data than any other company in the world.
E²G, an employee-owned engineering firm specializing in consulting services for new and aging infrastructure in refining, petrochemical, chemical and other industries. E²G helps clients improve profitability with consulting strategies and software tools that manage risk & control inspection costs throughout the life-cycle of a facility’s equipment.
E²G, an employee-owned engineering firm specializing in consulting services for new and aging infrastructure in refining, petrochemical, chemical and other industries. E²G helps clients improve profitability with consulting strategies and software tools that manage risk & control inspection costs throughout the life-cycle of a facility’s equipment.