Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

Advantages of Using Reliability Analysis Techniques to Improve RBI Risk Accuracy

By Abdallah Al Maqbali, RBI and Reliability Team Leader at OQ. This article appears in the September/October 2024 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
17 Likes

Introduction

Mechanical integrity and inspection professionals often rely on risk-based inspection (RBI) to determine equipment risk levels, prioritize inspections, and develop subsequent mitigation actions. In some equipment, if a leak occurs, there may not be a significant loss in production or an effect on the environment. In those cases, risk is rated as low despite the probability of failure being high. RBI risk can be plotted in a continuous log chart and calculated quantitatively. Figure 1 shows the concept based on which the RBI recommendations are generated when a fully quantitative RBI study is done. The figure reads that inspection should be done on the same date, or before, when the risk reaches the predetermined risk level (risk target). Accordingly, remedy actions are not required for those assets where the total risk associated with them does not reach the risk target.

Figure 1. Continuous Risk Chart for a Quantitative RBI.
Figure 1. Continuous Risk Chart for a Quantitative RBI.

RBI methodology assesses risk based on the likelihood and consequences of an event, typically with each asset evaluated individually. Reliability-based approaches can incorporate the potential risks associated with multiple simultaneous events of separate assets. Furthermore, they consider the consequences of non-release events. In the following case study, the risk of an individual exchanger tube leak may be assessed as “low” when RBI methodology is applied. But, if two or more exchanger tube leaks occur simultaneously, the consequences could be significantly higher. Statistical reliability-based methodologies can be applied to better assess the risks associated with potential simultaneous events involving separate assets.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Alexander Gonzalez on November 1, 2024
Sometimes the terms "exchangers" and "banks" are... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Neel Bhattacharya on January 14, 2025
Since the driver for a failure in a given bank,... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.