Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

FFS Forum: Updates to the New & Improved API 579 Standard

By Greg Garic, Principal at Stress Engineering Services, Inc. This article appears in the November/December 2021 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
44 Likes

Introduction

The current edition of API 579/FFS-1, Fitness-for-Service, was released in 2016. Five years later, the newest edition is expected in December 2021, so it should have been released by publication of this article.

There are many excellent changes and updates in this new edition, including significant technical changes and improvements, and hundreds of smaller editorial changes and corrections. In this FFS Forum article I’ll go through many of what I believe to be the most important changes. The document itself includes a more detailed list of important changes, which is worth a read.

I’ve organized this article by Parts, so you can focus on your particular areas of interest. I’ve skipped sections where I feel there are no major changes.

Part 2, Fitness-for-Service Engineering Assessment Procedure

MAWP by Analysis

This part includes what I perceive to be a fairly significant change to FFS procedures. All FFS assessments are cast in terms of evaluating the deficiency at the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP), and the MAWP has always been calculated by the Code formula (where one exists, e.g., shells and heads). The new edition of API 579 includes a provision to allow the MAWP to be calculated by the stress analysis procedure of Annex 2D, which lists procedures for elastic, limit load, and plastic collapse analysis. This means that in an FFS context, the MAWP can be calculated by elastic-plastic stress analysis methods. This could increase the rated MAWP of components and have a corresponding effect on the allowable pressure or thickness from an FFS assessment.

Division 2 Allowables for Division 1 Equipment

In the 2016 Edition, Annex C, paragraph 2C.2.4(c) stated:

“If a pressure vessel was constructed to VIII-1 and the flaw is located in the base material of a cylindrical shell, conical, or spherical shell outside the weld band, the allowable stress may be established in accordance with VIII-2.”

This paragraph has been deleted in the latest revision. No more using VIII-2 allowables! This was an artifact of API 510 before the ASME Div 2 safety factor changed to 2.4 (from 3.0).

Updated Rambert-Osgood Model

For those of you who use elastic-plastic analysis to obtain FFS assessments, you’ll find the Ramberg-Osgood model has been revised. The Ramberg-Osgood model is used to approximate the shape of the full stress-strain curve based on basic material properties, such as yield and ultimate stress.

This content is free for registered users

Register today to read this article for free.

Create your free account and you'll also get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on December 30, 2021
It was not released yet the standard, however I... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on December 30, 2021
The vibration part will be Part 15 and will be in... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Hervandil Santanna on January 6, 2022
Hello, I'm also expecting this review. Do you... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on January 7, 2022
I believe there is some ongoing work on a revised... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Rick Nichols on February 28, 2022
Wow! GREAT Summary, Greg and Tina...very... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Dhananjay Rawal on February 28, 2022 (Edited on February 28, 2022)
Thanks Greg for Excellent Overview of API 579... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Sunay Dalvi on March 1, 2022
Thank you Mr. Greg Garic for publishing summary... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Sunay Dalvi on March 1, 2022
Thank you Mr. Greg Garic for publishing summary... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Abdelhamid REBAI on March 1, 2022
Good, thank you Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Tushar Vaghela on March 1, 2022
Thank you Mr. Greg Garic & Tina Rautio for... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on March 1, 2022
Greg, please could you verify if figure 3.7 in... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on March 1, 2022
Fernando, Table 3.7M is correct. The X-axis is... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on March 2, 2022
Thanks Greg for clarifying this. Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by ASIM UDDIN SHEIKH on March 15, 2022
Please give the Guide line for distortion... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on March 15, 2022
Asim, I'm not sure I exactly understand the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on March 15, 2022
Asim, I'm not sure I exactly understand the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on March 31, 2022
Greg quick question, in Part 5 step 9.1 when the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on March 31, 2022
Hi Fernando. I agree. I think the 2021 edition... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Ganapathy Balasubramaniam on June 29, 2022
Thanks for sharing this nice insights on the... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on September 6, 2022
Hi Greg, quick question. In regards with pitting... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Greg Garic on September 6, 2022
Fernando, The way I read this is that once you... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by FERNANDO VICENTE on September 7, 2022
Thanks Greg, that is what I thought. It makes... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Talent Solutions

Discover job opportunities that match your skillset.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.