Inspectioneering Journal

Damage Control: Thermal Fatigue Assessment

By Phillip E. Prueter, Principal Engineer II and Senior Vice President of Consulting at The Equity Engineering Group, Inc. This article appears in the November/December 2020 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
This article is part 2 of a 3-part series on Thermal Fatigue.
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3

Editor’s Note:  This regular column offers practical insights into various damage mechanisms affecting equipment in the O&G, petrochemical, chemical, power generation, and related industries. Readers are encouraged to send us suggestions for future topics, comments on the current article, and raise issues of concern. All submissions will be reviewed and used to pick topics and guide the direction of this column. We will treat all submissions as strictly confidential. Only Inspectioneering and the author will know the names and identities of those who submit. Please send your inputs to the author at

Assessment Techniques

Historically, two considerations have encouraged the development of formal fatigue analysis methods. The first has been the need to provide designers and engineers methods that are practical, easily implemented, and cost-effective. The second consideration has been the need to reconcile accurate and meaningful analytical approaches.[1]  Conventionally, three primary fatigue analysis methods have been used to estimate fatigue life; these are the stress-life (S-N) approach, the strain-life (ε-N) approach, and the fracture mechanics (crack growth) approach.[1]  As discussed herein, specific versions of these three assessment methods are options for analysts in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service (API 579).[2]  Modern fatigue assessments typically utilize design-by-analysis (DBA) techniques to linearize and classify elastic stresses[3] into different components, and they often leverage computational tools such as FEA to resolve cyclic thermal-mechanical stresses at critical locations. Common fatigue cycle definitions and terminology are highlighted in Figure 1. When performing an analysis, cyclic thermal-mechanical stresses and strains computed over a typical (often idealized) operating cycle are extracted as inputs for the fatigue life assessment.

Figure 1. Basic definitions of a cycle required to characterize fatigue loading (adapted from [4]).
Figure 1. Basic definitions of a cycle required to characterize fatigue loading (adapted from [4]).

The current (3rd) edition of API 579[2] introduced a new section (Part 14), devoted solely to evaluating fatigue life. The complete technical basis for Part 14 is provided in Welding Research Council (WRC) Bulletin 550.[5] Additionally, the fatigue methods in Part 14 of API 579 are summarized in detail in [6-8]. For the sake of brevity, only a short summary of the API 579 fatigue assessment procedures is provided herein. Part 14 is written as a multi-level procedure covering screening, current ASME design Code methods, and advanced methods.[9] The advanced methods include fatigue assessment of welded joints using the equivalent strain, Master S-N Curve Method (based on the Battelle Structural Stress approach[10]), and a smooth bar fatigue assessment method that incorporates a multiaxial fatigue criterion with a strain-life equation, coupled with a critical plane approach.[11-13] Cycle counting methods for both welded joint and smooth bar fatigue methods are also provided, and methods to evaluate fatigue in the subcritical crack-growth regime are also covered.[14] An overview of the fatigue analysis methods outlined in API 579[2] is provided below.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

Posted by Christos Christoglou on February 23, 2021
Thank you for this.. i dare say scientific... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Darryl Bertram on March 21, 2023
Thanks Phillip and Inspectioneering for making... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.