Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

Understanding Hard to Interpret Field Hardness Values for Common Pressure Vessel and Piping Steels

By Ana Benz, Chief Engineer at IRISNDT. This article appears in the March/April 2020 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
17 Likes

Introduction

Often when reviewing field hardness values, if the results are not consistent with expectations, the values measured are dismissed. However, field hardness tests can provide extremely valuable information when evaluating piping and pressure vessel anomalies. In the specific failures and equipment examinations discussed in this article, field hardness tests gave the most insightful information for assessing challenging material anomalies compared to other laboratory and field tests.

This article summarizes laboratory examinations designed to gain a better understanding of Ultrasonic Contact Impedance (UCI) hardness test results taken in the field. Moreover, examples of cases where anomalous hardness values of new steel parts were associated with metallurgical and physical irregularities are shown. In all the cases, the UCI values measured were relevant and accurate.

To understand the cases, first, laboratory examinations performed to compare field UCI and bench model hardness tests are presented. Furthermore, the standard surface finish specifications are summarized.

Comparing Field UCI and Bench Model Hardness Tests

Bench model 10 kg HV indenter hardness tester indentations were compared to those made by a Krautkramer MIC 10 Ultrasonic Contact Impedance (UCI) tester. The hardness tests/indentations were made on a 142 HV and a 302 HV calibration block. The calibration blocks had a mirror grit finish (finer than #400 grit).

The MIC 10 UCI indentations were made with the field hardness indenter positioned at various angles with respect to the calibration block. The indentations were imaged with a KEYENCE 3D microscope. Despite the various indentation angles, the indentations had similar diameters and depths to those obtained by the bench model hardness tester for the same calibration block. See Figures 1 to 8. A key finding through these examinations was that the UCI field hardness indentation depth for 142 HV steel is approximately 20 μm.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Dana Baham on April 30, 2020
Hey Ana, great article, you put a lot of work... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by [Removed] on April 30, 2020
Hello, Dana, Thank you very much for the nice... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Manuel Alvarez on May 11, 2020
Gracias por tu artículo, muy ilustrativo.... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by [Removed] on May 11, 2020
Gracias a ti, Manuel. Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Neil Breslow on May 11, 2020
The MIC-10 and other UCI testers became popular... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Neil Breslow on May 11, 2020
One added comment. The MIC-10 developed by... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by [Removed] on May 11, 2020 (Edited on May 11, 2020)
Hello Neil, Material anomalies in ferrous... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Marten Sales on May 15, 2020
Great article Ana, Thanks for sharing Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by [Removed] on May 15, 2020
HI, Marten, Thank you. I'm glad you liked it. Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Neil Breslow on May 15, 2020
I agree that UCI measurements are somewhat... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by [Removed] on May 15, 2020
Hello, Neil, If you call "near perfect... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.