Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

The Real Expense and Liability of a Dated Engineering Standards Program

By Jeannie Lewis, VP of Practices and Engineering Solutions at The Equity Engineering Group. This article appears in the July/August 2019 issue of Inspectioneering Journal
12
Likes

Introduction

For most organizations, the late 1990s and early 2000s represent the pinnacle of their engineering standards program. At that time, organizations were well-staffed with industry experts who had the knowledge, resources, and availability to develop and maintain customized corporate engineering standards. These standards served as the nucleus of knowledge for the organization to:

  • Identify and ensure compliance with Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP),
  • Capture and transfer knowledge by documenting lessons-learned and corporate preferences, and
  • Reduce risk and improve organizational efficiencies through consistency.

Fast-forward to today and it is very likely that your organization is being asked to do more with less along with a less experienced staff as your senior experts continue to retire.

This operational shift has likely affected your engineering standards program, which likely consists of:

  • Partially maintained internal standards,
  • Inconsistent capital project standards,
  • Frozen legacy standards from acquisitions/mergers, and/or
  • Lengthy industry standards with options and ambiguities.

“Frankenstein” collections have become the norm, but these dated, confusing, and hard-to-use engineering standards are costly and exposing your organization to increased risk.

In this article, we provide a case study showing the real costs and effects of having a dated engineering standards program, as well as the financial benefits through increased reliability of having a thriving engineering standards program. We then provide pros and cons to consider for the most common solutions to help your organization choose a direction and solve this global, multi-industry challenge.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by MP Nair on October 21, 2019
Very authentic and educative the author deserves... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Posted by Matthew Knudsen on November 1, 2019
Thank you for taking the time to draft this... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Job Postings

Discover job opportunities that match your skillset.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.