| Date | May/June 2017 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Return to Journal Index | |
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering Journal Article Index
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy David E. Moore at Becht Engineering, PONO DivisionRead a firsthand account of how organizing Process, People, Plant, and Performance can reveal breakdowns in your corrosion management practices and drive down corrosion related leaks.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy Ryan Myers at PinnacleART, and Brian Marino at PinnacleARTEffective condition monitoring location selection is a key component of a best-in-class mechanical integrity program. Learn how moving beyond traditional qualitative approaches to optimized CML selection can reduce risk and maximize the value of each inspection.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy John Reynolds at Intertek35 years ago, an inspection supervisor, some inspectors, and a project engineer could cover an entire refinery. So why are so many more mechanical integrity resources needed today?
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy Geoff Clarkson at UTComp, Inc.Discover a new ultrasonic inspection approach that provides quantified mechanical integrity and conservative remaining service life information on fiberglass reinforced plastic equipment.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy Justin Nickel at PK TechnologiesAre you giving CUF the attention it deserves? Learn the vital role fireproofing plays in maintaining the integrity and reliability of what it protects as well as what's needed for managing potential CUF issues.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalSteam systems account for almost a third of the energy used in industrial applications for product output. Maintaining their integrity and efficiency is vital. Learn how an effective risk-management process aids in the optimization of these critical assets.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy Mike Asquini at T.A. CookRisk is an inherent aspect of asset management. Unfortunately, controlling it is easier said than done. Risk must be managed beginning with the initiation of a project and lasting until completion. How can one implement a reliable risk management program while balancing organizational demands?
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalThe "simple" process of PWHT is more complicated than it may appear at first glance. Knowledge of the procedures, attention to details, and actual experience are indispensable in preventing failures caused by improper PWHT.
-
May/June 2017 Inspectioneering JournalBy Hossam Aboegla at Lloyd's Register EnergyAsset integrity and life cycle management are unique but intertwined concepts. The dynamic process between these principles has a significant impact on the lifecycle of individual assets and, therefore, the integrity of an entire plant.
-
Partner ContentHow long does it take for you to receive reports after an inspection has been completed? A week? A month? Does the data come from multiple sources with no way of knowing if it has been manipulated? Traditional inspection contractors do not have the ability to provide reliable and real-time data once an inspection is complete. The only way to ensure accurate, reliable data is with technology.
