| Date | July/August 2015 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Return to Journal Index | |
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering Journal Article Index
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Neil Ferguson at HydratightWith the increasing demand for oil, gas, and petrochemical products in a highly competitive market, products and services irrespective of their origin must satisfy customer quality requirements. Additionally, the needs to ensure quality control and...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy John Reynolds at IntertekRarely is there a new and unknown cause of a major Fixed Equipment Mechanical Integrity (FEMI) failure in the petrochemical and refining industry. This article briefly summarizes five major fixed equipment mechanical integrity (FEMI) failures from...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Robert Frater at Engineering & Inspection Services, LLCRefinery, petrochemical, and storage tank operators are responsible for properly cleaning facility tanks on a periodic maintenance basis, typically in 20 to 30 year increments. This article provides a suggested “checklist” of inspection...
-
API 1169 Pipeline Inspector Certification Program – A Case for Why it Should be the Industry Standard
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Rikki Smith at Oilfield JobsSome hiring practices for new employees have been too lax for too long in the pipeline industry. Pipeline inspectors who have ever worked beside someone who was hired via the familiar “friends and family program,” recognize the need for more...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Greg Alvarado at Inspectioneering JournalAsset managers need to know when repairs and replacement are required for many reasons, including safe operation, accurate budgeting, replacement planning, and on-going reliability. When predicting design life based on a simple, linear corrosion...
-
Partner ContentHow long does it take for you to receive reports after an inspection has been completed? A week? A month? Does the data come from multiple sources with no way of knowing if it has been manipulated? Traditional inspection contractors do not have...
-
In-Place Pipe Support Load Testing & Hanger Surveys – Part of a Best in Class Fitness-for-Service Program
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Joe Frey, PE at Stress Engineering, Inc., Lange Kimball at Stress Engineering Services, and Britt Bettell at Stress Engineering ServicesThis article introduces portions of a “Best-In-Class” Fitness-for-Service (FFS) program that includes the performance of regular visual inspections of pipe supports and hangers, coupled with in-situ load testing of suspect supports. This...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Borja Lopez at Innerspec Technologies, Inc.Readers were previously introduced to some of the practical advantages of EMAT Ultrasonic Testing (UT) in the March/April 2013 and July/August 2013 issues of Inspectioneering Journal. In this article, I will cover the practical advantages of EMAT...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Melissa Ramkissoon at PetrotrinAboveground Storage Tanks (AST) are essential to any successful oil and gas operation and must be properly managed to ensure operations function in a safe and reliable manner. In this 2-part series, I will identify some common failures related to...
-
July/August 2015 Inspectioneering JournalBy Gary Mulcahy at Astrodyne TDIThis is the first article of a two-part series to be published in Inspectioneering Journal and will provide a basis for understanding the differences between traditional tapped-transformer, fixed voltage type rectifiers, and High Frequency Switched...
