Inspectioneering Journal

Update on the New API/ASME In-Service Inspection Joint Code Committee (ISIJC)

This article appears in the November/December 2007 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.

The ASME/API Inservice Inspection Joint Committee is continuing with its charter to develop and maintain a standard addressing inspection, repair, alteration and rerating for pressure vessels and piping systems after they have been placed into service for the petroleum refining and chemical process industries. This article is an update on the progress toward that goal and an explanation of some of the issues surrounding the effort.


In the mid 1990’s the API Subcommittee on Inspection (SCI) started discussions about creating a new international standard on In-Service Inspection of Pressure Vessels and Piping in the Petroleum Refining and Chemical Process Industries. Originally this standard was envisioned to be a joint effort including the API, ASME, and NB. But after several years or organizational efforts to get the project kick-started the National Board declined to participate, so the API and ASME joined forces to create the standard.

In the 2002 timeframe the API Committee on Refinery Equipment (CRE) and the ASME Board on Pressure Technology Codes & Standards (BPTCS) formed an Ad Hoc Project Team to explore the issues surrounding the creation of an In-Service Inspection Joint Code (ISIJC) for the petroleum refining and chemical process industries. That joint API/ASME Project Team produced a plan in the form of a white paper for the development of the ISIJC, including a proposed charter, organization, member participation, funding, timetable, proposed table of contents, etc. In 2005, both the API CRE and ASME BPTCS endorsed the plan and chartered the formation of the ISIJC committee, to draft the ISIJC for joint publication by both organizations. In January 2006, the first meeting of the ISIJC committee convened to start drafting the ISIJC. In the summer of 2007, the first draft of the new ISIJC was balloted to the two organizations. Nearly 450 comments were received on the first ballot. Based on that input, a second ballot is being prepared, which is expected to be issued early in 2008. Since one of the criticisms of the first ballot was that the one month balloting period was insufficient for a thorough review of a first draft, it is envisioned that the second balloting period will be longer.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.