Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

Combining NDE and Engineering Analysis to Optimize Tube Life in Steam Reformers

Part 2

By Richard D. Roberts at Quest Integrity Group, and John Brightling at Johnson Matthey Catalyst. This article appears in the November/December 2005 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
1 Like
This article is part 2 of a 2-part series.
Part 1Part 2

 

Part 1 in this 2 parts series laid the technical foundation for the methodology and technology. Part 2 will now demonstrate both through actual applications.

Case Study 1- Tunnel Port Effect

Correct sizing of tunnels and ports is essential to balance fluegas flows within the box.

Fluegas maldistribution will contribute to the variation in tube temperatures and lead to reduced furnace efficiency and limited firing rates. Also, in some circumstances, poor design of the tunnels and ports can have a much more dramatic effect; it can lead to premature tube failure. The failure is caused by localised creep damage at the bottom of the tubes and is shown schematically in Figure 6. The area of damage is typically 100 to 150 mm (4 to 6 inches) long, with the tube above and below the failure showing no damage.

Figure 6. Typical Furnace Tunnel Arrangement
Figure 6. Typical Furnace Tunnel Arrangement

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Udayan Patel on February 13, 2018
This is a great article for Client and EPC... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.