Inspectioneering Journal

Positive Materials Identification (PMI)

By John Reynolds, Principal Consultant at Intertek. This article appears in the September/October 1995 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.

In August of 1993, the hydrocarbon process industry once again experienced a catastrophic loss when a major coker unit fire occurred in Louisiana. The cause of that incident was not unlike many others that have occurred over the years throughout the industry.: inadvertent substitution of construction materials (CM). In that particular case a carbon steel elbow in a 5 Cr-1/2 Mo piping system ruptured due to hot sulfide corrosion. All other components in the system were made of the proper CM and were exhibiting low, predictable corrosion rates. One result of that incident is that the next three cokers built in the industry contained a requirement for 100% PMI on critical allow components.

Documented experience indicates that inadvertent CM substitution errors may be occurring in approximately 1-3% of all alloy components being installed. Such components include pipes, fittings, flanges, nipples, valves, and even individual welds. A typical refining process unit with a significant amount of alloy piping systems might contain 4,000-5,000 alloy components. A highly alloyed chemical process unit might have 4-5 times that amount.

In high-risk services, the industry recognizes that CM substitution errors must be prevented in order to minimize the risk of catastrophic losses. As such, many companies are taking steps to improve their specifications, controls and procedures to validate that specified alloy components are actually installed. These efforts are aimed at new construction, maintenance activities, and existing installations. Several companies are now requiring that suppliers and fabricators of alloy piping components provide up to 100% PMI verification of critical alloy components. At a minimum, suppliers should be forewarned not to substitute any CM without purchaser approval even if they believe the substitution would be an upgrade.

Recently the API Committee on Refining Equipment approved the formation of a PMI task group within the Subcommittee on Inspection. The first meeting of this task group was in May 1995. At that meeting, members outlined and began drafting an industry recommended practice on alloy CM control and verification. It is expected that it will take approximately 2.5 more years to generate, approve and publish the standard (API RP 578), utilizing the API/ANSI standards process; so I expect the recommended practice to be published and available in late 1997.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.

Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.

Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.


Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.


Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.


Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.


Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.