Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

A New Generation of Predictive NDE Sensor Technologies

By Angelique N. Lasseigne, Chief Technology Officer at G2MT, Joshua E. Jackson, CEO at G2MT, and Robert Schaffler, VP of Engineering at G2MT LLC. This article appears in the January/February 2015 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
7 Likes

Introduction

The rapid growth of networked devices is changing society and industry in ways we have only begun to feel. Networked sensors are showing up in our cars, pockets, houses, hospitals, offices, and are projected to find widespread application in industry. Think of the iPhone, Nest thermostat, iWatch, OnStar, fitness bands, and medical devices; sensor devices are literally showing up everywhere, and most are connected to the Internet (directly or through other devices). The total number of Internet connected devices is growing rapidly. From 2014 to 2015, 30% growth is projected (from 3.7 billion to 4.9 billion). By 2020, over 25 billion connected devices will be used globally (about 3 for every person on Earth). Many of those will be used in industrial applications; therefore it is critical that new technologies are available to monitor personnel and equipment and provide useful data. Similarly, the future of inspection will be based on predictive and proactive technologies that effectively monitor material properties of structures and systems over their entire service life.

This is part 1 of a 4-part series that will evaluate next-generation NDE inspection technologies. We start the series with an overview of how integrity management capabilities will be improved as networks of connected smart sensors become more mainstream. Parts 2-4 will explore various next generation inspection technologies in more detail.

The Next Generation of Inspection

The 1900’s saw the rise of the first NDE technologies and implementation of reactive maintenance plans in many industries. Reactive maintenance is when industry reacts to failures or flaws when they occur; it is the simplest, but least efficient or effective way to run a facility. Operators quickly realized that the ability to predict failures could make their lives much easier and reduce downtime dramatically, and that led to predictive inspection technologies and processes.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

Posted by Boris Urbina on March 3, 2015
In my experience the technology normally is not... Log in or register to read the rest of this comment.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.