Inspectioneering
Inspectioneering Journal

Assessing the Reduction in Spill Risk of the Keystone XL Special Conditions

By Sergio Oliva at Wild Well Control. This article appears in the May/June 2014 issue of Inspectioneering Journal.
3 Likes

Introduction

The Keystone XL is a proposed pipeline system intended to transport crude oil from existing facilities in Alberta, Canada to the United States Gulf Coast of Texas.  Its in-service date is projected for 2015, with an initial throughput estimated at 800,000 bpd.  The construction of the last pipeline segment is currently pending approval by the White House.  This segment is projected to extend for 1,115 miles from Hardisty, Alberta to an end-point near Steele City, Nebraska [1].  The Keystone pipeline operator has agreed to design, construct, operate, maintain, and monitor the project in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the US Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Parts 194/195, as well as a set of 57 project-specific Special Conditions (SCs) [2].  Since the SCs will influence key design, construction, operational, and maintenance variables of the pipeline system, they will therefore affect the potential for loss of pipeline integrity in its entirety during the system lifetime.  An adequate characterization of the SCs from the perspective of pipeline integrity and risk would be advantageous from the system onset for identifying latent flaws in the system spill prevention plans.

The risk to pipeline integrity is a function of the severity of the potential consequences stemming from a release of pipeline contents and the likelihood of a leak occurring [3].  The frequency of events that pose integrity threats and their associated consequences must be considered when conducting a pipeline risk assessment.  This article focuses on the frequency component of risk; in particular, the assessment of the probability of the causes that could result in eventual loss of containment for the Keystone XL pipeline system.

This content is available to registered users and subscribers

Register today to unlock this article for free.

Create your free account and get access to:

  • Unlock one premium article of your choosing per month
  • Exclusive online content, videos, and downloads
  • Insightful and actionable webinars
GET STARTED
Interested in unlimited access? VIEW OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Current subscribers and registered users can log in now.


Comments and Discussion

There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Please log in or register to participate in comments and discussions.


Inspectioneering Journal

Explore over 20 years of articles written by our team of subject matter experts.

Company Directory

Find relevant products, services, and technologies.

Training Solutions

Improve your skills in key mechanical integrity subjects.

Case Studies

Learn from the experience of others in the industry.

Integripedia

Inspectioneering's index of mechanical integrity topics – built by you.

Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest inspection and asset integrity management news.

Blog

Read short articles and insights authored by industry experts.

Expert Interviews

Inspectioneering's archive of interviews with industry subject matter experts.

Event Calendar

Find upcoming conferences, training sessions, online events, and more.

Downloads

Downloadable eBooks, Asset Intelligence Reports, checklists, white papers, and more.

Videos & Webinars

Watch educational and informative videos directly related to your profession.

Acronyms

Commonly used asset integrity management and inspection acronyms.